In relying upon recorded historical information to piece together the jigsaw
puzzle of this lost Castle, this account will commence from a time predating the actual construction of the
Castle - with the invasion of Britain by
William the Conqueror. The Conquest of
Britain by William radically changed the country in many ways – but perhaps one
of the most significant was his introduction of efficient administration systems
which involved recording and auditing his newly conquered realm. It is from this
action that the Domesday Book came about. Of course Weddington as a place existed
before this activity, but it is with the Domesday Book of 1086 AD that it
emerges into the realm of recorded history and therefore this seems an apt point
at which to begin this account.
It is worth mentioning that,
of course, the area that was to become Weddington was very much alive with
activity before the Domesday Book recordings. A pre-Roman, probably Iron Age,
camp has been found at Oldbury on a high defensive position above the Anker
Valley, formed by a hard rock outcrop that itself contains rare fossils. The
Romans also left their mark on the area - a Roman fort was found in 1980 at
nearby Coleshill, whilst Mancetter (or Manduessedum) has long been known as the
site of another significant and large Roman fort. Some archaeologists think that
it was the home of the fourteenth Roman Legion and that Queen Boadicea (Boudicca)
met her fate outside the fort in the Anker Valley. Closer to home the
finding of a Bronze Age flat axe in a field to the north east of St James'
Church in Weddington, suggests activity in the area at this time. A more
detailed account of the pre-Domesday history of the area can be found in the
Timelines section.
That said, it seems particularly fitting that Weddington’s
first documented appearance occurred at the turn of the first millennium, whilst
this record is being produced at the turn of the second millennium, 1000 years
later.
As it happens, at the time of its recording in the Domesday Book, Weddington was
known by its early Saxon name of ‘Watitune’ and consisted of a small village built alongside the River Anker,
with an estimated population of 105. No priest is mentioned in Domesday and it
is uncertain when a church was first established on the site (the current church
dates back to the early 1300s, but the font within the church is from the 12th
century and may have come from an earlier building). The Domesday Book itself details the
following at 'Watitune':
The above Domesday Book entry
translates as:
"The count [Meulan] himself holds 3 hides [1 hide
= roughly 120 acres] in WEDDINGTON and Hereward [holds] of him. The same man
held them TRE [rightful ownership] and was free. There is land for 7 ploughs*.
In demesne are 1 ½ [ploughs], and 4 slaves; and 12 villans [landed peasants] and
5 bordars with 4 ploughs. There are 20 acres of meadow, [and] woodland 2
furlongs long and 1 furlong broad. It is worth 30 shillings."
*NB: at the time of the Domesday a plough implied
a plough team with 8 oxen and the plough itself.
Whilst we might imagine Watitune at this time to be a village as we tend to know
them today - compact, centred around a church and separated by open land -
it was most likely not. Instead, habitations in most areas of late 11th century England
followed a very ancient pattern of isolated farms, hamlets and tiny villages
interspersed with fields and scattered over most of the cultivable land.
At the time of the conquest the land upon which Watitune lay was owned by the
Saxon
Hereward
the Wake. Whilst William gave the manor of Weddington (among several
others) to one of his noblemen,
Count Meulan, after the conquest it appears that Hereward retained
possession this land by becoming an under-tenant of Count Meulan’s.
This would have rankled with Hereward not just because of his dispossession but for
the reason that under-tenancy incurred a debt of military duty to his new Norman
lord. This arrangement reflected the same pattern of most
counties after the conquest, with various lands being distributed amongst
different heroes of the
Battle of Hastings, whilst the King retained direct control of most of the
strategically important holdings and wealthy lands.
Count Meulan (otherwise known as Roger de Beaumont) was one of William's most favoured
benefactors as well as being the most powerful seignior in Normandy. Sometimes
the records in England show him as Robert, although this may be caused by a
confusion between his son, Robert, and Roger who actually held the lands. Roger adopted the title Count of Meulan from Adelina, his wife's family.
Roger received from William 90 manors in
Warwick, Leicester, Wiltshire and Northampton. There is dispute whether he,
Roger, was actually at Hastings as he was old at the time, but records show that
he contributed 60 ships to the invasion force.
It is more likely that he was represented by the young Robert, his son, at the
Battle of Hastings. By the taking of the Domesday survey, it was Robert
who known as the Count of Meulan, having inherited the title in 1082 on his
father's death. He also became a peer of France. He was also known as Roger de
Beaumont, or simply Earl Roger, and became the 1st Earl of Warwick, and the Earl
of Leicester. Initially, although a
very powerful magnate, he was only the custodian of the grants made to his
father by Duke William until his father's death. By 1082 however, he had
inherited all his father's estates in England and in Normandy. Count Meulan held
a total of 57 manors in Warwick at the Domesday survey. His Chief domain in
England was Sturminster Marshal in Dorset, whilst he shared with the King the
great power in Warwickshire. His other holdings were as follows:
Henry de Beaumont, his younger brother, later succeeded Count Meulan to the
Earldom of Warwick, although the land of Weddington was subsequently granted to
Philip Astley by Henry I in 1100. By this time Weddington was still a modest
village, with the notion of the Castle yet to be considered.